In the novel “Bleak House,” Charles Dickens introduces us to
Harold Skimpole, a man who seems charming and reasonable but is quickly
revealed to be a mooch and a parasite. Skimpole lives comfortably off of
his friends. Even worse, he believes he’s entitled to the standard of
living his friends provide, giving no thought at all to what it took to
make his life comfortable in the first place.
Western culture is
Skimpole-like. In other words, we take ideas such as freedom and human
dignity for granted, without ever stopping to think about where those
ideas came from in the first place.
Just ask Dr. David Mackereth
who, for 26 years, worked for Britain’s National Health Service, mostly
in Accident and Emergency wards. By all accounts, he was an excellent
doctor.
In 2018, Mackereth was assigned to Britain’s Department
for Work and Pensions as a disability assessor. During his training, a
senior employee told Mackereth and others they should always address
transgender people by their preferred pronoun, “in line with the
department’s policy.”
When Mackereth told the senior employee
that, as a Christian, he could not, “in good conscience,” use pronouns
that way, he was informed that if he refused to follow the policy, he
was at risk of losing his job. A few days later, when he reiterated that
he couldn’t follow the policy in good conscience, he was fired.
Mackereth appealed
his sacking to an employment tribunal, saying that his rights to
freedom of thought, conscience, and religion had been violated. He told
the panel that for religious reasons he could not refer to “any six-foot
tall bearded man” as a “she” or a “her.”
He then cited Genesis
1:27, “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he
created him; male and female he created them.”
Given the state of
British culture right now, it’s not surprising that Mackereth lost his
appeal. What is surprising is just how full-Skimpole-like the tribunal
went in its ruling.
The tribunal said, and I quote, “Belief in
Genesis 1:27, a lack of belief in transgenderism and conscientious
objection to transgenderism in our judgment are incompatible with human
dignity and conflict with the fundamental rights of others.”
This is like finding milk in your supermarket and rejecting that any part at all was played by dairy farmers or cows.
The
Bible verse cited by MacKereth and repudiated by the tribunal is the
singular basis for the idea of human dignity and “fundamental rights.”
Without “God created man in his own image,” the imago dei, the only dignity anyone possesses is what others are willing to give them.
The
truth is that had Scripture not introduced the image of God to the
world’s lexicon in the first place, the notion of human dignity wouldn’t
exist. Even raging atheist Friedrich Nietzsche acknowledged that. The
ancient world didn’t recognize universal human dignity, nor did any
philosophy other than Christianity even imagine it.
I’m not
saying, of course, that Christians always lived up to this truth, either
personally or within their societies. What I’m saying is that no one
would recognize it as truth had Christianity not grounded it in some
way. Or as another atheist, author and philosopher Luc Ferry wrote in
his book, “A Brief History of Thought”: “Christianity was to introduce
the notion that men are equal in dignity; an unprecedented idea at the
time and one to which our world owes its entire democratic inheritance.”
The
history of the idea of human dignity is striking and clear, but it’s
also ignored by a culture that, like Skimpole, never thinks about where
the good things of modern life really come from. Christians can serve
the world by reminding it of its own history, not least of which
because human dignity will never last if it is untethered from the one
and only source that ever gave it to the world in the first place.
No comments:
Post a Comment