A joint congressional resolution for a “Green New Deal” is the latest
effort aiming to apply political solutions to environmental problems.
Whatever the merits of the proposal, one theologian says, Christians
must think hard about what their faith says about environmental policy.
“To think that the U.S. government can be agnostic about the
environment is a little like thinking it’s agnostic about faith:
policies will impact the environment, for good or for ill,” Joseph
Capizzi, professor of moral theology and ethics at Catholic University
of America, told a local media.
“It strikes me that the Christian approach to the environment would
require us to think about our policies’ impact on creation. Or, to put
it differently, about whether our policies give God his due in their
impact on his creation,” said Capizzi, who also directs the Institute
for Human Ecology.
U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and U.S. Sen. Ed Markey,
D-Mass., have proposed a joint resolution to recognize “the duty of the
federal government to create a Green New Deal.”
The non-binding resolution would not create new programs, but its
passage would convey the sense of Congress and provide justification for
further legislation.
The new resolution cites the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change’s most recent report, which said that a rise in global
temperatures must not exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius over preindustrial
levels to avoid the worst effects of climate change.
Though Capizzi said addressing particular policies is beyond his expertise, he said Christians are a “future-oriented people.”
“We look in hope to the coming of our savior and our reflections on
how to live now should always have an eye towards their long-term impact
on the world into which, in hope, we bring our children,” he said. “We
have justice-based responsibilities to our children to care for the
creation God intends for them as well as for us.”
As a theologian, Capizzi said, the specifics of the proposal “are
less interesting to me than is the idea that politics must attend to
humanity’s relationship with all of God’s creation.”
The political proposal comes as the Trump administration has worked
to promote domestic gas, oil and coal production by loosening
regulations including environmental protections.
Green New Deal backers cite goals including zero-net greenhouse gas
emissions from power production; halting a rise in global temperatures;
and de-carbonizing the manufacturing and agricultural sectors. It
envisions major infrastructure upgrades to power grids and
transportation and upgrading all buildings to maximize energy
efficiency, water efficiency, and affordability. Other goals in the
resolution include “clean manufacturing”; reducing pollution and
greenhouse gas emissions from ranches and farms; and shifting away from
nuclear power as well as fossil fuels.
Critics say some efforts against fossil fuels have caused major
unemployment and community displacement in parts of the country
dependent on the coal industry and other resource extraction.
U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., whose state economy is heavily based on
coal, criticized the effort, saying it “shuts everybody down.”
The resolution’s many promises include aid for both communities
facing the most significant changes from climate change and communities
affected by shifts away from fossil fuel use. It promises to ensure high
wages and better jobs for workers currently in fossil fuel industries.
The non-binding plan promises a federal jobs guarantee, as well as
other Democratic goals like a family wage, adequate family leave, paid
vacations and a secure retirement as well as universal health care.
Any proposal is unlikely to pass the Republican-controlled Senate.
The resolution could play a role in the 2020 Democratic presidential
nomination.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi did not give Green New Deal backers the
committee leadership they wanted. She told Politico their proposal is
“one of several or maybe many suggestions that we receive.”
For Capizzi, environmental politics should be motivated by the goodness of creation.
“The starting point for Jewish-Christian approaches to the
environment is the Hebrew Bible’s teaching that God created the world,
and then, at different stages but before humans are created, we are told
he viewed his creation as ‘good’.”
These things that God names “good” include “the creation of land and
gathering of waters, the fecundity of the earth, (and) the creation of
sea and land and flying creatures.” The creation of humans is “a part of
the story of God’s creation of a universe he names as good and within
which humanity lives.”
“This is the starting point for Christian reflection,” Capizzi said in a statement . To this is added the “classic notion of justice” expressed in the
imperative “give to each what he or she is due.”
“We are to give God his due by giving his good creation its due. We
do this in our relationships as human beings, but we do this as well in
our relationship with the creation of which we are a part – even if a
special part.”
No comments:
Post a Comment